News

Supreme Court Sides With Homophobic Baker Who Refused to Make a Wedding Cake for a Same-Sex Couple

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple.

via NYDN:

The Supreme Court ruled narrowly Monday for a Colorado baker who wouldn’t make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. But the court is not deciding the big issue in the case, whether a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gay and lesbian people.

The justices’ limited ruling turned on what the court described as anti-religious bias on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission when it ruled against baker Jack Phillips. The justices voted 7-2 that the commission violated Phillips’ rights under the First Amendment.

Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion that the issue “must await further elaboration.” Appeals in similar cases are pending, including one at the Supreme Court from a florist who didn’t want to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding.

The same-sex couple at the heart of the case, Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins, complained to the Colorado commission in 2012 after they visited Phillips’ shop in suburban Denver and the baker quickly told them he would not create a cake for a same-sex wedding.

Colorado law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and the commission concluded that Phillips’ refusal violated the law. Colorado state courts upheld the determination.

But when the justices heard arguments in December, Kennedy was plainly bothered by comments by a commission member. The commissioner seemed “neither tolerant nor respectful of Mr. Phillips’ religious beliefs,” Kennedy said in December.

That same sentiment suffused his opinion on Monday. “The commission’s hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion,” he wrote.

Liberal justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the conservative justices in the outcome. Kagan wrote separately to emphasize the limited ruling.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.

The world we live in…

Share This Post
Denver Sean

Denver Sean (Twitter: @DNVRSN): Editor/Writer. He's been with B. Scott since 2009 and has his hands in all things related to lovebscott.com. Any questions, comments, concerns -- let him know!

Published by
Denver Sean
Tags: Say What Now

Recent Posts

Quavo Performs For Shockingly Small Crowd, Fans Blame Chris Brown [Video]

Quavo's recent concert's getting attention online. As of late, Chris Brown and Quavo have been…

3 hours ago

Britney Spears Says There Has Been ‘No Justice’ After Settling Conservatorship Case: ‘My Family Hurt Me’

Britney Spears has taken to social media to express her feelings about the recent legal…

3 hours ago

Say What Now? Man Arrested After Admitting He Goes to Starbucks Drive-Thru Naked to See the ‘Pretty Girls’

It seems that Starbucks employees at the Broken Arrow drive-thru had no trouble remembering Michael…

4 hours ago

Zendaya and Tom Holland Have Discussed Marriage: Report

According to recent reports, Zendaya and Tom Holland have had discussions about marriage, which suggests…

6 hours ago