Comments on: Halle Barry Covers Harper Bazaar

By: Ebony

Ebony — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:35:46 +0000

I have definitely seen much better pics of her than these!! I’m surprised at this mag!!

By: Ebony

Ebony — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:15:56 +0000

Harper’s Bazaar dropped the ball on this one…

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:37:16 +0000

Dont a flattering mag cover of Ms.Berry

By: blindedbyblonde

blindedbyblonde — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:13:32 +0000

Bazaar obviously is cutting back the fees on better known photographers. They also are cutting back on photo editing experience.

I really think the font is something that an older and outdated editor chose to bring back a youthful appearance. Its bad form all the way.

Also, who ever decided to put her in a cheap wig that screams of retro Charlie Angels, should be shot.

I don’t think they did this on purpose but I do think it is a strong statement of where this magazine is headed.

I think Bazaar left this issue to one of the receptionist, or worst a gay queen from the mail room.

By: PJ

PJ — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:56:03 +0000

The bags under her eyes make her look hideous! She looks like a witch with that wig. These photos make her look much older than what she is. Just Awful!

By: leslie arnelle

leslie arnelle — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:46:59 +0000

I don’t like it at all…first Vogue with that horrible cover of the fabulous MO now this…YUK!

By: Brandon33

Brandon33 — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:59:55 +0000

loves it.

Halle Berry’s just such a graceful, classy beauty. Notice that she never rocks a ton of makeup, and when she does it’s always the nude look. Halle ALWAYS looks fresh-faced.

Halle has that classic elegance. This woman will be beautiful well into her 80’s.

By: yes

yes — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:30:18 +0000

don’t like the wig